Does it portray the Gazans as the main trouble makers though?
Saturday, November 07, 2009
Friday, October 16, 2009
Iranian truth.
What is it with these people who continually target the Iranians?
I looked at the recent UN G5+1 meeting on TV.
The Iranian president started to say his piece, but half the delegates at the meeting walked out. The president made no mention of the holocaust at all during his speech.
The British, Americans and of course, the Israelis left the hall.
But wait! None of them left when the Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, started to give his oration.
Very confusing as surely the Israelis killed 1400 Palestinian civilians during their attacks in January 2009; surely they have refused to allow the IAEA to inspect their "secret" nuclear facilities; surely they continue to ignore UN resolutions, amongst them to cease the collective punishment of the Palestinians and to cease building settlements in occupied territory; surely they use illegal weapons like White Phosphorus on civilians?
Some countries are applying double-standards in continually victimising Iran, yet supporting Pakistan in its aquisition of nuclear weapons, which at the time was a military dictatorship!
The Iranians have never attacked anybody, could it possible that they really want to just have nuclear energy, not bombs, but who can blame them if they DID want a device to to protect themselves from all the hostile countries around them bristling with nuclear bombs and missiles. The fascist state, Israel, would seem to be the most hostile, and the most dangerous.
Why doesn't the international community stop supporting the apartheid regime which is Israel; stop selling them weapons; stop giving them money like they are some sort of third world country, and above all shun them for being the fascists that they are.
Germany has sold that country two nuclear submarines, and have agreed to make them another. All of these are capable of carrying nuclear missiles, insanity.
(I shall make adjustments to this blog as it is quickly typed and just off the cuff)
I looked at the recent UN G5+1 meeting on TV.
The Iranian president started to say his piece, but half the delegates at the meeting walked out. The president made no mention of the holocaust at all during his speech.
The British, Americans and of course, the Israelis left the hall.
But wait! None of them left when the Israeli prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, started to give his oration.
Very confusing as surely the Israelis killed 1400 Palestinian civilians during their attacks in January 2009; surely they have refused to allow the IAEA to inspect their "secret" nuclear facilities; surely they continue to ignore UN resolutions, amongst them to cease the collective punishment of the Palestinians and to cease building settlements in occupied territory; surely they use illegal weapons like White Phosphorus on civilians?
Some countries are applying double-standards in continually victimising Iran, yet supporting Pakistan in its aquisition of nuclear weapons, which at the time was a military dictatorship!
The Iranians have never attacked anybody, could it possible that they really want to just have nuclear energy, not bombs, but who can blame them if they DID want a device to to protect themselves from all the hostile countries around them bristling with nuclear bombs and missiles. The fascist state, Israel, would seem to be the most hostile, and the most dangerous.
Why doesn't the international community stop supporting the apartheid regime which is Israel; stop selling them weapons; stop giving them money like they are some sort of third world country, and above all shun them for being the fascists that they are.
Germany has sold that country two nuclear submarines, and have agreed to make them another. All of these are capable of carrying nuclear missiles, insanity.
(I shall make adjustments to this blog as it is quickly typed and just off the cuff)
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
"Asylum seekers??"
Watching the news broadcasts of the clearance of the illegal immigrant camp at Calais, one cannot help but be struck by the singular lack of women and girls being led away by the French police.
As many of these so-called "Asylum seekers" are from Afghanistan, one would tend to ask the question "Why?" Surely it is the women who are the most oppressed in that country? Not the young men that we saw.
I hope that our 'government' does not give in to the moral blackmail that we have been hearing, and realise that these illegals, including any children present, went to Calais of their own free will, and should claim asylum in France, as per European law.
They are patently economic migrants, and we have enough of those in our country already.
Our population is now 70 million and climbing; time to put up the barriers and realise that we simply cannot absorbed the whole population of Afghanistan or anywhere else within this country.
As many of these so-called "Asylum seekers" are from Afghanistan, one would tend to ask the question "Why?" Surely it is the women who are the most oppressed in that country? Not the young men that we saw.
I hope that our 'government' does not give in to the moral blackmail that we have been hearing, and realise that these illegals, including any children present, went to Calais of their own free will, and should claim asylum in France, as per European law.
They are patently economic migrants, and we have enough of those in our country already.
Our population is now 70 million and climbing; time to put up the barriers and realise that we simply cannot absorbed the whole population of Afghanistan or anywhere else within this country.
Sunday, September 13, 2009
Thousands of complaints and counting....
Since my last blogs on this charade of a video-sharing site, YouTube, not a SINGLE thing has been done about the thousands of complaints concerning the freezing of video viewcounts at around 300.
Any "Contacting" of them is restricted to using one E-mail address which never replies with any useful advice; just "help pages" which explain nothing. Posting to their blogs and "help" groups just adds to many more complaints.
These people must easily be the most devious , deceitful and unhelpful operators of a Website EVER.
Their "customer service" is non-existent. If they were an ISP or public utility they would be Bankrupt by now, having lost all their users. They must be losing thousands of users over this in any case, perhaps they think that they can afford to? How long can that go on?
Any "Contacting" of them is restricted to using one E-mail address which never replies with any useful advice; just "help pages" which explain nothing. Posting to their blogs and "help" groups just adds to many more complaints.
These people must easily be the most devious , deceitful and unhelpful operators of a Website EVER.
Their "customer service" is non-existent. If they were an ISP or public utility they would be Bankrupt by now, having lost all their users. They must be losing thousands of users over this in any case, perhaps they think that they can afford to? How long can that go on?
Monday, September 07, 2009
Are YouTube trying to offload its users?
Still, after tens of thousands of complaints, this stubborn company refuses to address the frozen viewcounts situation; answer questions, or even give a proper place to make complaints! They are sticking their corporate heads in the sand hoping that the complaints about frozen viewcounts will go away: it will not!
I think that they are deliberately trying to get thousands of users to delete their accounts, because they are overloaded.
See this video which may explain a few things:
I think that they are deliberately trying to get thousands of users to delete their accounts, because they are overloaded.
See this video which may explain a few things:
Wednesday, September 02, 2009
Police out of control?
Readers of my blog will know that I am always interested in Justice for all, and that it is carried out and enforced in an impartial manner.
Most of us have heard of the G20 demonstrations; the death of one person who was not even connected with the protest and the slapping of a tiny woman by a thug in uniform. This video, from the British newspaper, the "Guardian" shows the thuggery which the British police are capable of.
Just in response to a request for the number of this particular thug, two women were subjected to ill-treatment worthy of the Apartheid regime of South Africa.
You shall have to copy & paste this URL.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/video/2009/jun/21/fit-watch-kingsnorth-arrests
Most of us have heard of the G20 demonstrations; the death of one person who was not even connected with the protest and the slapping of a tiny woman by a thug in uniform. This video, from the British newspaper, the "Guardian" shows the thuggery which the British police are capable of.
Just in response to a request for the number of this particular thug, two women were subjected to ill-treatment worthy of the Apartheid regime of South Africa.
You shall have to copy & paste this URL.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/video/2009/jun/21/fit-watch-kingsnorth-arrests
Monday, August 31, 2009
YouTube: still unlistening dirtbags.
Well, here we go again. August 25th: Upload two videos of Tasmin Archer, a great singer and very popular. Took the trouble to shoot the video, edit, then upload to the dirtbag site again. Here, now August 31 2009, the viewcounts haven't changed since August 27th, at 303 & 306 views.
The videos are linked to MySpace, Facebook and have been multi-twittered, yet according to the YouTube scumbags, no-one had looked at them since August 27! Do me a favour idiots, fucking FIX IT!!!
The videos are linked to MySpace, Facebook and have been multi-twittered, yet according to the YouTube scumbags, no-one had looked at them since August 27! Do me a favour idiots, fucking FIX IT!!!
Thursday, July 09, 2009
YouTube dirtbags
Oh wonder!! YouTube has now decided to force an unwanted new system on us users, changing the profile page from the easy to use old one!
No consideration, and taking no account of the 6,000 complaints on its blog!!
Is this company trying to commit suicide, or merely trying to cut the number of users? They shall succeed in both cases if they carry on ignoring the people who made them big.
No consideration, and taking no account of the 6,000 complaints on its blog!!
Is this company trying to commit suicide, or merely trying to cut the number of users? They shall succeed in both cases if they carry on ignoring the people who made them big.
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
YouTube the biggest gaff.
YouTube has learning difficulties apparently.
Last March they posted a blog on their website telling of a new phase of operation; namely they are freezing the view counts of those they consider to be deliberately manipulating those counts, and they remain frozen until the actual count catches up with the "manipulated"one.
But, wait! why have some of MY counts been frozen, and what about the almost 2,000 replies to their blog who deny such underhandedness?
These people are morons if they think that this shall be tolerated; they ignore all requests to have this problem looked at again, and an email address at the top of the blog is not a real one. Write to it and get the usual list of YouTube so-called "Help" pages, which are no use at all. Finding ANYONE or any address to make a complaint to on YouTube is impossible, and it's a frustrating task looking; going round and round and round and round to eventually get back to where you first started.
What it needs is for a MASS evacuation of users from that site, or for someone, or many, to actually go round and see to them at their California office.
Here's a copy of a letter sent to the editor@youtube.com
The non-answer I may place here also:
Dear Madam.
I have been reading your editor's blog about this subject of so-called "manipulated viewcounts, and made a few contributions to that blog, noticing at the same time, many disgruntled and indeed furious other members' notes.
Judging by the number of posts to that blog, and the time since it was first placed on line, do you not think it time to address members' concerns, and take another look at this?
I have had two videos which seem to have been deliberately slowed-down or count arrested in the last few weeks.
I am NOT manipulating my videos at all, and if your robot detects my Web browser, screen size, and IP address when I first upload, then it is because of Edits of the side-panel notes, and the adding of annotations, each time that an edit of both is made it is necessary to look at the video again, and after an annotation is completed an invitation to view the video is given at the top of the screen.
There is also no harm or malicious intent to view one's own video to test for playback quality of sound and speed, and some choppiness has been noted on some videos. I think it high-time that this problem is addressed and your own robot given an overhaul to look for real spamming, etc.
I uploaded a new video lasting just over seven minutes last Sunday: it has proved popular and the count was high. Now it has been arrested at 311, which seems to be a nominal number for other users too. This must change, and I shall not be uploading any more at all until this is sorted out. Maybe treating users badly, so they delete their accounts or no longer upload to YouTube is what it is all about.
The video in question and I know that MANY have viewed it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqRPS_IkxIY
Last March they posted a blog on their website telling of a new phase of operation; namely they are freezing the view counts of those they consider to be deliberately manipulating those counts, and they remain frozen until the actual count catches up with the "manipulated"one.
But, wait! why have some of MY counts been frozen, and what about the almost 2,000 replies to their blog who deny such underhandedness?
These people are morons if they think that this shall be tolerated; they ignore all requests to have this problem looked at again, and an email address at the top of the blog is not a real one. Write to it and get the usual list of YouTube so-called "Help" pages, which are no use at all. Finding ANYONE or any address to make a complaint to on YouTube is impossible, and it's a frustrating task looking; going round and round and round and round to eventually get back to where you first started.
What it needs is for a MASS evacuation of users from that site, or for someone, or many, to actually go round and see to them at their California office.
Here's a copy of a letter sent to the editor@youtube.com
The non-answer I may place here also:
Dear Madam.
I have been reading your editor's blog about this subject of so-called "manipulated viewcounts, and made a few contributions to that blog, noticing at the same time, many disgruntled and indeed furious other members' notes.
Judging by the number of posts to that blog, and the time since it was first placed on line, do you not think it time to address members' concerns, and take another look at this?
I have had two videos which seem to have been deliberately slowed-down or count arrested in the last few weeks.
I am NOT manipulating my videos at all, and if your robot detects my Web browser, screen size, and IP address when I first upload, then it is because of Edits of the side-panel notes, and the adding of annotations, each time that an edit of both is made it is necessary to look at the video again, and after an annotation is completed an invitation to view the video is given at the top of the screen.
There is also no harm or malicious intent to view one's own video to test for playback quality of sound and speed, and some choppiness has been noted on some videos. I think it high-time that this problem is addressed and your own robot given an overhaul to look for real spamming, etc.
I uploaded a new video lasting just over seven minutes last Sunday: it has proved popular and the count was high. Now it has been arrested at 311, which seems to be a nominal number for other users too. This must change, and I shall not be uploading any more at all until this is sorted out. Maybe treating users badly, so they delete their accounts or no longer upload to YouTube is what it is all about.
The video in question and I know that MANY have viewed it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqRPS_IkxIY
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)